W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > December 2013

Re: UserInteraction vs. InteractAction

From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:03:12 +0100
Message-ID: <529F6050.5060107@wwelves.org>
To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
CC: Sam Goto <goto@google.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
On 11/25/2013 07:42 PM, Sam Goto wrote:
> Absolutely! Thanks for taking a closer look!
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com
> <mailto:danbri@google.com>> wrote:
>
>     +Cc: Sam
>
>     On 25 November 2013 09:17, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
>     <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org
>     <mailto:perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>> wrote:
>      > Howdy :)
>      >
>      > I noticed some duplication (which causes confusion at least for
>     me) between:
>      > *Thing > Event > UserInteraction* - "A user interacting with a page"
>      > http://schema.org/UserInteraction
>      > vs.
>      > *Thing > Action > InteractAction* - "The act of interacting with
>     another
>      > person or organization." - http://schema.org/InteractAction
>      >
>
>
> As Dan said earlier, the plan here is to deprecate UserInteraction and
> its subtree in favor of actions. We believe this is a much more scalable
> sub-tree with a more solid foundation for extensions.
>
> Dan: is there a process for deprecating sub-trees?
Can we for now just somehow mark UserInteraction and its sub types as 
deprecated + leave reference to ongoing work on Actions? I would find it 
a shame if someone put work into implementing something using 
UserInteraction while we already seems to decided on deprecating it.
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 17:02:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:36 UTC