W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Missing subClassOf?

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:05:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp3FNJgQh3o+VZYMgwM4bPLmU6DFSJeApA-qPB2BJoW8QUbDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

> The reason to give a schema.org definition of 'Class' and 'Property' is
> for self-contained documentation. The reason to express that it is
> basically the same notion as rdfs:Class, rdf:Property and owl:Class is to
> support wider interoperability.
> The properties domainIncludes and rangeIncludes are not just for RDFa use,
> but they're primarily there for schema.org to capture / express  / share
> the fairly loose meaning of its main property<->class associations, without
> over-stretching rdfs:range or needing complex OWL expressions.

OK.  Understood.  Can we please have a schema:subClassOf for the same
reasons?  :)

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 16:05:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:29 UTC