Re: Missing subClassOf?

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

>
>
> The reason to give a schema.org definition of 'Class' and 'Property' is
> for self-contained documentation. The reason to express that it is
> basically the same notion as rdfs:Class, rdf:Property and owl:Class is to
> support wider interoperability.
>
> The properties domainIncludes and rangeIncludes are not just for RDFa use,
> but they're primarily there for schema.org to capture / express  / share
> the fairly loose meaning of its main property<->class associations, without
> over-stretching rdfs:range or needing complex OWL expressions.
>

OK.  Understood.  Can we please have a schema:subClassOf for the same
reasons?  :)


-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics