Re: Proposal: Looking inside tables

I think I like that, it's a good compromise to mitigate the situation, at
least applications which would do something with a item of type 'Painting'
would ignore this data item. The proposal should then include a step to
remove the 'SetOf/' prefix and apply 'Painting' to each row.

Steph.


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Guha <guha@google.com> wrote:

> Actually, an earlier version of the proposal from Omar dealt with this
> very well by having the typeof='SetOf/Painting'. So, applications that are
> aware of this kind of markup can do the right thing, while others don't
> have the unintended consequence.
>
> guha
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Stأ©phane Corlosquet <
> scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From the proposal:
>>
>> <table typeof="Painting" vocab="http://schema.org/">
>>   <thead>
>>     <tr>
>>       <th property="image">Image</th>
>>       <th property="name">Title</th>
>>       <th property="dateCreated">Year</th>
>>       <th>Technique</th>
>>       <th>Dimensions</th>
>>       <th property="contentLocation">Gallery</th>
>>     </tr>
>>   </thead>
>> <tbody>...</tbody>
>> </table>
>>
>> It should be noted that parsers which are not aware of this table
>> extension would generate this information:
>> <>
>>    rdf:type schema:Painting;
>>    schema:image "Image";
>>    schema:name "Title";
>>    schema:dateCreated "Year";
>>    schema:contentLocation "Gallery" .
>>
>> How do you plane to cope with this situation? Leave it be? Would it have
>> unintended consequences on some applications?
>>
>> Steph.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Omar Benjelloun (ط¹ظ…ط± ط¨ظ†ط¬ظ„ظˆظ†) <
>> benjello@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Many useful datasets on the Web take the form of tables. The goal of this
>>> proposal is to provide a simple, schema.org-friendly way to "look inside"
>>> these tables, and map their contents into triples.
>>>
>>> This is an early draft proposal developed at Google. We're seeking
>>> feedback from the community.
>>>
>>> The proposal is attached to this e-mail, and will be uploaded to the
>>> WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals page shortly.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Omar
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steph.
>>
>
>


-- 
Steph.