W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > April 2013

Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 06:20:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFqfiNY9_FRYGv6oRyHk-feBdpcb208wT3tALFVMXT1buw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
Cc: Marc Twagirumukiza <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 30 April 2013 05:39, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote:
> The WebSchemas wiki is here: http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas
>
> With proposals tracked here: http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals


Thanks, Richard. Yes, the main home for notes and proposals is the W3C
wiki.  The main WebSchemas page links to
https://www.w3.org/accounts/request which is how you get a W3C
account. These are available to the public, as well as to people from
W3C member organizations.

Marc - it would be great to have proposals for improvements to that
area of the schema. As always, proposals associated with use of the
vocabulary are generally most interesting to schema.org. In this case
I imagine there usage scenarios that go beyond public Web pages; it
would help if those could be sketched, alongside any vocabulary
additions/changes.

One other thing to mention: recently, new schemas have been documented
using HTML+RDFa+RSS files; see
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/default/schema.org/ext for some
examples. Doing so would help us move more quickly with any changes.

cheers,

Dan

> ~Richard.
>
> From: Marc Twagirumukiza <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com<mailto:marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>>
> Date: Monday, 29 April 2013 16:58
> To: "public-vocabs@w3.org<mailto:public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org<mailto:public-vocabs@w3.org>>
> Cc: "danbri@danbri.org<mailto:danbri@danbri.org>" <danbri@danbri.org<mailto:danbri@danbri.org>>
> Subject: Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
> Resent-From: <public-vocabs@w3.org<mailto:public-vocabs@w3.org>>
> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 30 April 2013 07:52
>
> Dear Colleagues,
> Although it has been clearly stated that our goal is not to replace the comprehensive medical ontologies, there some useful properties and classes missing  in MedicalEntity hierarchy and concepts.
> I would like to contribute in extending the MedicalEntity ontology, by adding some of the properties and classes related to the MedicalProcedure (like encounter, medicalVisits, etc) and Data reporting (linking to Clinical document or Report).
> Can anyone update me how to access the Schema.org proposals space?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Marc Twagirumukiza | Agfa HealthCare
> Senior Clinical Researcher | HE/Advanced Clinical Applications Research
> T  +32 3444 8188 | M  +32 499 713 300
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2013 10:20:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:27 UTC