W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > April 2013

Re: more schema

From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 18:24:24 +0530
Message-ID: <CAMXe=Sp_8P2COmNGhmG2Ro2=xRMoENKgNU+07u0yKSt4NczLoA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jason Ronallo <jronallo@gmail.com>
Cc: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Thank you very much all

Have been hearing on and off bout schema.org but its the first time that I
come close to doing something with/about it - an opportunity to catch up
with what's going on in this space for me

Danbri, look forward to followup post with more details about the story,
thanks

Dan Scott, good luck with your talk look forward to materials about your
talk

and Jason, will definitely add it to your collection when we have something
worthy

cheers

P



On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Jason Ronallo <jronallo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I keep bookmarks of libraries, archives, and museums that use
> schema.org that might be useful to you. I'd love to see other LAM
> examples and add them as well.
>
> https://pinboard.in/u:jronallo/t:schema.org/t:example/
>
> Jason
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > reposting under a new subject line
> >
> >
> >> Greetings Schema.org Taskforce
> >>
> >> Just joined this list, with a couple of things in mind
> >>
> >> 1. In general, trying to learn about schema.org developments, what's
> new,
> >> whats happening (or not :-), in particular interested at thsi moment
> about
> >> what is happening in library linked data, as I am preparing a talk I ll
> give
> >> in the summer.
> >> if possible pls point me to archives, repositories and
> >> interesting/relevant threads
> >> where I can learn the latest
> >>
> >> 2.
> >>
> >> I am working with a team of students in India on an exercise in web
> >> information collection/publishing, and we are precisely working on
> temple
> >> metadata
> >>
> >> Having found that a schema already exists,
> >> http://schema.org/HinduTemple
> >> we plan to use it, however we
> >> would like to extend it ( data is missing from this schema based on our
> >> experience) How can we contribute to refine/improve this particular
> schema
> >> on schema.org?
> >>
> >> This for me brings up the question how  the schemas are pulled together
> in
> >> the first place, based on what knowledge/construct/process?
> >>
> >> (Since starting the exercise I have learned about this mailing list, so
> I
> >> may invite some students to join here if they so wish)
> >>
> >>
> >> cheers
> >>
> >> PDM
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> And we're back. Apologies for the hiccup!
> >>>
> >>> On 5 April 2013 01:48, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> >>> > Excuse this brief note; I'll write more in a week. We've just
> >>> > published a revision to schema.org including substantial new
> >>> > vocabulary that improves
> >>> >
> >>> > The new version is numbered 1.0a indicating that this is approaching
> a
> >>> > full 1.0 release but that we still have a few additions to make
> before
> >>> > we declare we're at a full 1.0.
> >>> >
> >>> > The 1.0a additions are considered stable, but we will fix any bugs or
> >>> > problems that implementors encounter during this 'soft release'.
> >>> > Additions include the Datasets vocabulary, LRMI for
> >>> > education/learning, technical publishing vocabulary, more vocabulary
> >>> > for describing Audiences, and some supporting utility terms for
> >>> > describing schema.org types, properties and their
> inter-relationships.
> >>> >
> >>> > I won't attempt here to list everyone who contributed to these new
> >>> > additions (it deserves a blog post), but thanks for all your hard
> work
> >>> > and patience. There are plenty more additions still in the pipeline
> >>> > and I look forward to following this announcement with work towards a
> >>> > 1.0b update. In the meantime please share any feedback, issues etc on
> >>> > the WebSchemas and LRMI lists.
> >>> >
> >>> > http://schema.org/docs/full.html as always has pointers to the full
> >>> > vocabulary.
> >>> > For LRMI, http://schema.org/AlignmentObject is the main type,
> >>> > alongside additions to http://schema.org/CreativeWork
> >>> > For Datasets, we added http://schema.org/Dataset and some nearby
> >>> > types...
> >>> >
> >>> > Dan
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 12:54:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:27 UTC