W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > April 2013

Re: more schema

From: Jason Ronallo <jronallo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:30:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKedLN1OyZiETs4i9vCJsSnsEirYKuz+yB7KHTchTS=kmhc01Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: paoladimaio10@googlemail.com
Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hi,

I keep bookmarks of libraries, archives, and museums that use
schema.org that might be useful to you. I'd love to see other LAM
examples and add them as well.

https://pinboard.in/u:jronallo/t:schema.org/t:example/

Jason

On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
> reposting under a new subject line
>
>
>> Greetings Schema.org Taskforce
>>
>> Just joined this list, with a couple of things in mind
>>
>> 1. In general, trying to learn about schema.org developments, what's new,
>> whats happening (or not :-), in particular interested at thsi moment about
>> what is happening in library linked data, as I am preparing a talk I ll give
>> in the summer.
>> if possible pls point me to archives, repositories and
>> interesting/relevant threads
>> where I can learn the latest
>>
>> 2.
>>
>> I am working with a team of students in India on an exercise in web
>> information collection/publishing, and we are precisely working on temple
>> metadata
>>
>> Having found that a schema already exists,
>> http://schema.org/HinduTemple
>> we plan to use it, however we
>> would like to extend it ( data is missing from this schema based on our
>> experience) How can we contribute to refine/improve this particular schema
>> on schema.org?
>>
>> This for me brings up the question how  the schemas are pulled together in
>> the first place, based on what knowledge/construct/process?
>>
>> (Since starting the exercise I have learned about this mailing list, so I
>> may invite some students to join here if they so wish)
>>
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> PDM
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> And we're back. Apologies for the hiccup!
>>>
>>> On 5 April 2013 01:48, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>>> > Excuse this brief note; I'll write more in a week. We've just
>>> > published a revision to schema.org including substantial new
>>> > vocabulary that improves
>>> >
>>> > The new version is numbered 1.0a indicating that this is approaching a
>>> > full 1.0 release but that we still have a few additions to make before
>>> > we declare we're at a full 1.0.
>>> >
>>> > The 1.0a additions are considered stable, but we will fix any bugs or
>>> > problems that implementors encounter during this 'soft release'.
>>> > Additions include the Datasets vocabulary, LRMI for
>>> > education/learning, technical publishing vocabulary, more vocabulary
>>> > for describing Audiences, and some supporting utility terms for
>>> > describing schema.org types, properties and their inter-relationships.
>>> >
>>> > I won't attempt here to list everyone who contributed to these new
>>> > additions (it deserves a blog post), but thanks for all your hard work
>>> > and patience. There are plenty more additions still in the pipeline
>>> > and I look forward to following this announcement with work towards a
>>> > 1.0b update. In the meantime please share any feedback, issues etc on
>>> > the WebSchemas and LRMI lists.
>>> >
>>> > http://schema.org/docs/full.html as always has pointers to the full
>>> > vocabulary.
>>> > For LRMI, http://schema.org/AlignmentObject is the main type,
>>> > alongside additions to http://schema.org/CreativeWork
>>> > For Datasets, we added http://schema.org/Dataset and some nearby
>>> > types...
>>> >
>>> > Dan
>>>
>>
>
Received on Sunday, 7 April 2013 20:31:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:27 UTC