W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Move isPartOf to CreativeWork from WebPage?

From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@oclc.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:20:46 +0100
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, <lrmi@googlegroups.com>
CC: <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CC8BB71E.2A82%richard.wallis@oclc.org>

On 28/09/2012 19:56, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
>> Summary:
>>  - move isPartOf from WebPage to CreativeWork
> I'd support this, and it will bring us into line with the same term
> used in the Dublin Core community,
> http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-isPartOf

Looking at this from the bibliographic/library world I would be inclined to
support this too as it would enable better support for collections, series,
and multi-part works.

However, CollectionPage is a bit restrictive - I was hoping that there was a
generic CreativeWork/Collection to relate to.  I would have thought this
would also make more sense for the LMRI community.

>>  - add hasPart to CollectionPage
> I'm conflicted; it seems useful but I'm wary of introducing inverses
> casually, and for only some of our terms.

I can understand your reticence, but surely one of the prime properties of a
collection is its part(s).


Richard Wallis
Technology Evangelist
Received on Friday, 28 September 2012 19:21:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:25 UTC