W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2012

Re: schema.org+Microdata: additional namespaces?

From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:58:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGR+nnF0pnZ+j27sJ21Z_eAkNVnwS9bBq0dPZr4XtOctXXB3LQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cord Wiljes <cwiljes@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Cord Wiljes <
cwiljes@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:

>  Am 08.09.2012 00:02, schrieb Stéphane Corlosquet:
> Schema.org offers a work around for that via the additionalType property:
> "An additional type for the item, typically used for adding more specific
> types from external vocabularies in microdata syntax. This is a
> relationship between something and a class that the thing is in. In RDFa
> syntax, it is better to use the native RDFa syntax - the 'typeof' attribute
> - for multiple types. Schema.org tools may have only weaker understanding
> of extra types, in particular those defined externally." - you can see it
> on all schema.org type pages, e.g. http://schema.org/Person
> As RDFa is more advanced than Microdata: Would it make sense to use
> Microdata for schema.org and mix it with RDFa for other vocabularies
> (like Dublin Core, Good Relations,...)?

While you technically could do that, I concur with Martin and would use one
syntax only.

Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 13:59:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:25 UTC