W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2012

Re: schema.org+Microdata: additional namespaces?

From: Cord Wiljes <cwiljes@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:20:57 +0200
Message-ID: <504DB0F9.70409@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Am 08.09.2012 04:56, schrieb Gregg Kellogg:
> No, it's perfectly acceptably for the @itemprop terms to come from 
> different namespaces, which is why it's appropriate to use absolute 
> URLs in addition to terms relative to @itemtype.


If I use itemtypes from different namespaces I have to state the all 
namespaces of the corresponding itemprops explicitly? Would the 
following example (mixing schema.org and Dublin Core) be correct?

    <div itemscope itemtype ="http://schema.org/Book
    http://purl.org/dc/terms/BibliographicResource" >
        <h1 itemprop="http://schema.org/name
    http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title">Hamlet</h1>
    </div>
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 09:21:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 September 2012 09:21:26 GMT