W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Breaking news: GoodRelations now fully integrated with schema.org!

From: Jocelyn Fournier <jocelyn.fournier@wiktik.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:50:28 +0100
Message-ID: <50A10CB4.7060208@wiktik.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: Jocelyn Fournier <jocelyn.fournier@googlemail.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, danbri <danbri@google.com>, Robert Schroeder <bobsc@charter.net>
Hi Dan,

Actually I think there's perhaps an issue with the rich snippets tool.
I've just changed my main type from IndividualProduct to Product, and 
now the tool complains about an incomplete microdata with schema.org.

And I don't see what could be missing, I'm giving much more informations 
than the "Product" example in the rich snippets tool.

Note also if you specify

<div itemprop="about" itemscope="itemscope" 
itemtype="http://schema.org/Product">

instead of

<div itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Product">

the tools doesn't extract anything.

Am I missing something here ?


Thanks,

Jocelyn Fournier | WIKTIK
Directeur Technique
+33 (0) 489 685 620
+33 (0) 786 630 561
www.wiktik.com
think about the environment before printing

Le 12/11/12 12:38, Dan Brickley a écrit :
> On 12 November 2012 11:14, Jocelyn Fournier
> <jocelyn.fournier@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Same question, I've just tried to implement some of the GoodRelations
>> markup, but nothing is display in the snippets and the markup seems to be ok
>> :
>>
>> http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wiktik.com%2Fmode-beaute-sante%2Fsoins%2Foffre-speciale-sport-370984&html=
>>
>> Any idea ?
>
> This is where we have to distinguish between products/services and
> vocabulary. Google's Rich Snippet system (and those from other search
> engines) probably won't do anything visibly interesting with this
> markup right now. The basic update that happened before the vocabulary
> launched was to ensure that the Testing Tool did not complain when
> encountering new vocabulary, but this isn't the same as providing
> snippets/UI for it. Robert has found a corner-case where unnecessary
> warnings are triggered, and I've passed his testcase along to the
> relevant engineering team at Google. While I can't give a timeline for
> when Google or any other search engine will update their services, I
> think it's fair to say the importance and potential of this vocabulary
> is widely appreciated.
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan
>
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 14:51:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 12 November 2012 14:51:06 GMT