W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > May 2012

Re: For review: Schema.org / Good Relations integration

From: Eric Franzon <eric@semanticweb.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 09:45:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHcHjrrY8Q28p5e6uooDivenw0eVkBW8cZSTV4mknwXFeh0h+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Myers, Jay" <Jay.Myers@bestbuy.com>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Indeed! I look forward to reading and hearing more.

Cheers,
--Eric

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Myers, Jay <Jay.Myers@bestbuy.com> wrote:

> This is great news for commerce :-)
>
> Jay
>
>
>
> On 5/11/12 11:30 AM, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
>
> >Via http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals
> >
> >Excerpting from http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/GoodRelations
> >
> >"""The schema.org team and Martin Hepp (Good Relations project lead)
> >have been discussing integration of a version of Good Relations into
> >schema.org.
> >
> >The idea follows the precedent with IPTC's rNews, whose vocabulary was
> >added in 2011. The schema.org site would give credit in a similar form
> >to rNews, and Good Relations as a project would continue
> >independently. However the majority of GR's terms would be reflected
> >into schema.org's core vocabulary.
> >
> >* See
> >[
> https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1Kx63gW9DBky1j97Jpwl3dU9k0pKPSgCT
> >3EntTVvGjX4
> >public working document]
> >* The issues [https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/15 Add
> >Time for xsd:time, DateTime for xsd:datetime] and [14: Schema.org
> >booleans (True/False) vs RDF 'true/false'] stem from this
> >collaboration.
> >* See also the [[WebSchemas/ExternalEnumerations|ExternalEnumerations]]
> >document.
> >* See [http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/ Good Relations]
> >site for background, e.g.
> >[http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Quickstart quickstart] page.
> >* Schema.org already has [http://schema.org/Offer Offer] and related
> >terms, but will benefit from adding detail from Good Relations. [...]
> >"""
> >
> >
> >
> >I'm sure many of you here are famliar with Good Relations already.
> >Martin Hepp and the schema.org team have been discussion the
> >possibility of integrating GR into schema.org, following the precedent
> >of the earlier IPTC/rNews schema which was added last year. The idea
> >is that we would add class and property definitions from GR into
> >schema.org, alongside source acknowledgement / credit in the relevant
> >pages (see http://schema.org/Article for an rNews example).
> >
> >Martin has a public working document linked from
> >http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/GoodRelations which has the full
> >details. As you'll see this is a substantial piece of work, so we
> >welcome in particular detailed review comments on the specifics. The
> >issues http://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/14 and
> >http://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/15 are directly related
> >btw.
> >
> >cheers,
> >
> >Dan
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


-- 
*Eric Axel Franzon*
Vice President of Community
SemanticWeb.com
6080 Center Dr., 6th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90045

eric@semanticweb.com

LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/ericfranzon
Twitter: http://twitter.com/SemanticWeb
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 16:45:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 06:49:04 GMT