W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > May 2012

On using qualified names for properties

From: Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:36:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4FAB6FE3.3030308@tu-cottbus.de>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: Guha <guha@google.com>, public-vocabs@w3.org
Dear Dan,
Is it any ongoing discussion  with respect of defining URIs for property 
names? Actually Schema.org defines some property names the same as some 
class names (such as aggregateRating vs AggregateRating). I would say 
that URIs and/or qualified names may not necessarily be directly used by 
the webmasters but they are useful to be defined.  Of course a web 
server may consider case sensitive URLs but maybe an agreement  on 
defining URIs is much useful.

Thank you very much,
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 07:36:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:23 UTC