W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > March 2012

Question on proposed sports vocab extensions for schema.org

From: Paul Wilton <paul.wilton@ontoba.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:57:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CALer3ua67JZK_qVu2SobhVpcZVhw8kG2iaW2x+CzOnkOQx7YiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Hi
I have been working recently at the Press Association with the Sport
ontology, modelling the Olympics , Football and Horse Racing. I have
been following the proposed sports vocabulary extensions for
Schema.org, and have a question around these constructs :

Thing > Person > SportsAthlete
Thing > Person > SportsAthlete/Baseball
Thing > Person > SportsAthlete/Football

I guess I am not 100% comfortable with the idea of sub-classing a
Person as an Athlete - I dont really see an Athlete as a more
specialised form of a Person, but rather than a Role or Vocation that
a Person takes in life.

Just because we tend to think of many roles/vocations as being people
oriented (Doctor, Engineer), in many cases they are not. For example
in this case ESPN list "Secreteriat" , a race horse, in their top 50
Atheletes of the century (number 36)  :

http://espn.go.com/sportscentury/athletes.html

Thus, if ESPN marked up their list against this vocabulary, we would
be inferring that Secreteriat is a Person.

So I am keen to understand the reasoning behind this approach , or of
this could possibly be changed such that Roles (temporal) /or
Vocations (possibly not temporal)  are separate Things that are
applied via some other relationship to a Person (or a Horse or a Robot
for that matter)


kind regards,
Paul Wilton
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 14:59:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 06:49:00 GMT