W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:14:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CAM=Pv=Q_q6_md54+kZXyMRy5B5Trg9uCx83fvEdt05MP-Yz+fA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, public-vocabs@w3.org
(Afraid I haven't time at the moment to go through the history
properly, so if this point has already been discussed, please ignore)

I looked at the Event construct with a view to potentially reusing it
in the context of projects. But there's a slight problem: Event is
associated with a time and a *place*. While in practice it may still
be possible to use the term without assigning a place, it seems a
little untidy.

There is already a bit of messiness as it stands: an Event could be a
meeting, right? In what Place does a teleconference or Hangout happen?

I think it would be desirable to redefine Event solely as something
that happens at a particular point in time, allowing the term to be
reused much more widely. I don't believe this would break any current
uses. YMMV as far as logical interpretation of schema.org terms is
concerned, but in one universe at least, decorating a time-only Event
with a Place seems a lot more sensible than assigning a time+place
Event a null place.




http://webbeep.it  - text to tones and back again
Received on Saturday, 3 March 2012 12:15:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:22 UTC