Looks like there was some interest after all :) http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Sports I can start with a comparison of the ESPN/Google contribution with SportsML. A good way to turn up issues and points of interest? On 2012-01-10, at 1:55 PM, Paul Kelly wrote: > Hi, just an introductory note and a question or two.... > > I am the Chair of the IPTC's Sports Content Working Party. We developed the SportsML xml standard for sports data: > > http://www.iptc.org/site/News_Exchange_Formats/SportsML-G2/ > > We're broadening the mandate of our group to cover sports-related semantic standards, not just the xml. SportsML already has a rich list of properties that have been filtered for rationality and internationalization so I think our group could make a contribution to any sports vocabulary standard. > > Any interest here in developing terms for sports? I've already been in touch with Chris Jason: > > http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2011/08/microdata-sports-stats-happy-fans.html > > I'd like to hear from any who has an interest and might wish to participate. > > ------------------------------------------- > Paul Kelly > Director, Software Development, XML Team Solutions Corp. > Chair, Sports Content Working Party, IPTC > > ------------------------------------------- Paul Kelly Director, Software Development, XML Team Solutions Corp. Chair, Sports Content Working Party, IPTCReceived on Friday, 2 March 2012 20:45:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 06:48:59 GMT