<quote name="Dan Brickley" date="2012-06-27" time="21:03:53 +0200">LRMI proposal contains intendedEndUserRole property with the same purpose,Looking at this again ... in terms of "what can we do now for
contaning some text (which is also a soft enum).
integration, while still moving quickly towards including LRMI 1.0"?
From LRMI, as you say, http://www.lrmi.net/the-specification
* intendedEndUserRole schema.org/Text The individual or group for
which the work in question was produced. Ex: “student” Ex: “teacher”
Would a minimalistic improvement here be, to allow intendedEndUserRole
to also (as an alternative) point to a thing of type
I think this might make sense, or, we could do as is suggested on the--
Create a Thing->Intangible->Audience->EducationalAudience
That EducationalAudience could initially have a single added term on top
of what Thing provides called "educationalRole" (or similar). That
educationalRole would take a text value that specifies the specific role
that the group identified by EducationalAudience.
That would mean that anyone who has already begun marking up content
with LRMI would need to modify their markup from:
<span itemprop="audience" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EducationalAudience">
(that assumes we get rid of intendedEndUserRole in favor of the Audience
If we did what you suggest ("allow intendedEndUserRole to also (as an
alternative) point to a thing of type http://schema.org/Audience") what
would it look like with a Audience intangible in the place of the
intendedEndUserRole value? I might be misunderstanding some aspect of
the syntax but it would seem it would be more nested than the example I
have above? Am I missing an easy way to model that?
Education Technology & Policy Coordinator
twitter: @g_gerg / identi.ca: @greg / skype: greg.grossmeier