On 19 December 2011 18:00, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks everyone for weighing in on this (and sorry for the double post - a blank message seems to have been delivered rather than this one). [...] Thanks Aaron and everyone for raising this and for the productive discussion. I have opened and summarised the issue in our tracker (which doubtless has been robotically emailing the list as I type). Issue: https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/10 (taking conclusions from this mail...) Action: (on me to bring this to the schema team esp. re fixing examples), https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/actions/3 I think there might be a bit more investigation to do on whether consumers are expecting links, plain text, hypertext, ... so I've made a note to do that too. cheers, Dan > So my takeaways are two-fold: > > 1. The schema.org examples are incorrect, and each individual breadcrumb should > be declared with itemprop. > 2. While schema.org describes the breadcrumb property as "[a] set of > links" the expected property is text rather than URL, which at least > technically affirms that breadcrumbs need not be links. > > Thanks!Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 17:42:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 06:48:59 GMT