W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Type for Wines

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:13:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CAChbWaPVYQU5y_nT1XDHnyEJKPuX4fCRkt0rwUY0AyiE-c9A8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
I forgot to mention... with those existing schema.org Types, you should be
able to recreate some Wine Reviews that I modeled here in
Freebase<http://www.freebase.com/view/base/wineawards/views/wine_award>
.

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> Wine is not a created work itself (although we like to think that way),
> but instead a manufactured good or Product.  Where you could have a
> CreativeWork like an http://schema.org/Article about that manufactured
> good or Product or even a thorough  http://schema.org/Review that gave
> the Wine Product a not so good http://schema.org/Rating
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Radu Silaghi <r@r-s.ro> wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> What type do you think would better describe wines ?
>>
>> While schema.org/Product would be self-explanatory ,
>> schema.org/CreativeWork  would better describe it with
>> sourceOrganization, creator, award, rating, etc.
>>
>> Many thanks for feedback.
>>
>> Radu Silaghi
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Thad
> http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
>



-- 
-Thad
http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
Received on Saturday, 11 August 2012 14:13:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 August 2012 14:13:30 GMT