Re: proposal for new classes Activity and Action

Makes sense Danny. Please continue to monitor discussion on Action/Activity
to make sure they'll be extensible for your use case. Others have contacted
me offline about their desire to represent "subtasks," and the Event
Ontology that Bob mentioned in this thread also seems to argue for having
some kind of subEvent/subActivity relation available.

Have a good weekend,
d

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:23, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 19 April 2012 22:02, Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Looks good.
>
> Just a heads-up about possible future correspondences - asap I'll have
> a run through the (generic) Project vocab I suggested [1] a little
> while ago, several of the terms there will probably be specializations
> of terms around Action and/or Activity.
>
> Cheers,
> Danny.
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2012Feb/0108.html
>
> --
> http://dannyayers.com
>
> http://webbeep.it  - text to tones and back again
>