W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Re 2: RDFa 1.1 Lite

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:19:52 -0400
Message-ID: <4EA33378.5060801@digitalbazaar.com>
To: W3C Vocabularies <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 10/22/2011 03:55 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> one more technical question. Has @inlist been discussed? Is it part
> of RDFa Lite? (I would expect the answer being no, but better check
> it...)

I think @inlist is too complex for the authors that are considered for 
RDFa 1.1 Lite.

However, that opinion is debatable. :)

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Standardizing Payment Links - Why Online Tipping has Failed
http://manu.sporny.org/2011/payment-links/
Received on Saturday, 22 October 2011 21:20:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 06:48:56 GMT