Hi Jeni, > > This is part of the point of my posting about this :) We have a problem here, in that the mapping of properties typed URL to literal values in the schema.org OWL ontology clashes with the assumption in the microdata-to-RDF mapping that we've been developing [1], which assumes that any @href, @src etc provides the identifier of a resource, giving the property an object value rather than a literal value. Thanks, I haven't seen this mapping yet. I'm happy to change the generated OWL file to bring it in line with this mapping. One technical point: this new mapping seems to consistently talk about URI references, while the microdata spec talks about URLs. Further, if I say in the OWL ontology that 'url', 'image' etc. are object-properties, then the value can be any URI. However, the intent is to restrict the publisher to providing URLs. Am I nitpicking? Thanks, PeterReceived on Saturday, 5 November 2011 18:30:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 06:48:57 GMT