Re: Update on new standards proposal

On 18 Oct 2010, at 7:56 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:

> On Oct 18, 2010, at 13:55 , Ian Jacobs wrote:
>> On 18 Oct 2010, at 5:17 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
>>> All this to say: before we jump into solution-space, maybe  
>>> drafting those minimal infrastructure requirements would help :)
>>
>> Here they are:
>> http://www.w3.org/2010/07/community#infrastructure
>
> Unless I've missed something, that's the "original" list of  
> requirements. Arnaud was talking about an even more trimmed down  
> version (and I was agreeing).

Ok, just confirming.

>
> It's entirely possible that I've missed options (I would certainly  
> hope so) but I've been shopping around for some off-the-shelf  
> software that does something quite similar to what's on that short  
> term list and I've come to the conclusion that the simplest solution  
> would be to build it (especially taking into account evolution  
> possibilities). That's not a pleasant prospect.

+1 to not rolling our own if possible.

  _ Ian

>
> But again, I'd be happy to be proven wrong!
>
> --
> Robin Berjon
>  robineko — hired gun, higher standards
>  http://robineko.com/
>
>
>
>
>

--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447

Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 13:00:37 UTC