- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:47:04 -0500
- To: art.barstow@nokia.com
- Cc: "public-vision-newstd@w3.org" <public-vision-newstd@w3.org>
On 12 Aug 2010, at 1:03 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi Ian, All, > > I finally scanned this document: >> http://www.w3.org/2010/07/community >> > Nice work, especially the table in section 2.2.7! > > Below is my personal cut on the main properties of the three > different groups/processes/objectives. > > I recall arguing against XGs because I thought they were effectively > IGs + some steriods. I still think that is essentially true but if > tweaking/revamping IGs and XGs would bring more communities in the > W3C and eliminate various little islands with different processes, > IP policies, etc., then that would be great. > > -Regards, ArtB [snip] Art read the document a particular way, which prompted me to call him to chat. I clarified that the proposal amounts to: * A single starting point for new ideas * Lightweight groups for ideas with traction * Standards groups for those proposals requiring stability, IPR commitments from orgs, etc. I continue to edit and will send a ping tomorrow afternoon. _ Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2010 19:47:07 UTC