Re: Comment Periods EXTENDED | NIST Identity Guidance

Manu,
May want to collaborate on that with Kimberly.  She has already pulled a
lot together for a CCG response, with input from myself and Harrison.

Mike Prorock
mesur.io

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023, 13:47 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 2:46 PM Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> wrote:
> > Lots of good discussion and interest from many parties regarding
> feedback on making sure VCs are covered in applicable areas.
>
> For those of you that are short on time, but want to add your voice to
> something: I'm planning on authoring something from the perspective of
> /some/ CCG and VCWG members with the ability to have a list of
> signatures at the end of the document.
>
> The goal with the document would be to be non-divisive and general in
> the feedback (to collect the most signatures): "We think that the VC
> Data Model and Issuer-Holder-Verifier model should be included in
> these documents given that it is a global standard, being deployed in
> pilots and production, is awesome for reasons X, Y, and Z, etc. etc.
> etc." The message is intended to be positive and speak only to VCs
> (not disparage or speak to other technologies in the space). The
> message also will not be "this is the position of the VCWG or CCG",
> but rather, "Here is a list of organizations and individuals, the
> professional societies they're a part of (CCG, VCWG, DIF, ToIP, OASIS,
> ISO), and a show of general support for including more about VCs in
> NIST Special Publications".
>
> Just a heads up that, given NIST personnel showed up to our meetings
> and asked for our feedback as a community, we should try to provide it
> to return the favor for the time they shared with us.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021)
> https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
>
>

Received on Friday, 17 March 2023 22:17:00 UTC