W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vc-wg@w3.org > June 2017

[PLEASE READ] Terminology oll options, call for objections

From: Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:57:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+Enjb+iHVkUYzPrbK95zmwyuVMWa=eMyagwnwxnO2b-zNo6Dw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Verifiable Claims Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
Group,

In today's VCWG call [1] we took a brief in-call poll to determine which
options would be included on the instant run-off voting poll that Manu has
been assembling.  Most of the decisions on what to include were made during
the call, but the ROLE_C votes were a bit close.

Manu and the chairs (thanks Matt!) tallied the in-call responses for
ROLE_C, [2] and based on the results have selected the following options to
be on the poll:

ROLE_A: Subject

ROLE_B: Issuer, Authority, Author, Signatory

ROLE_C: Holder, Presenter, Asserter, Claimant, Sharer, Subject's Agent,
Prover, Mediator

ROLE_D: Inspector, Evaluator, Verifier, Consumer, Relying Party

Other than the concern with this approach that Ted already raised on the
call, does anyone have any objections against this set being the set that
will be used for the Instant Run-Off Vote (IRV)?

If no objections are raised by 5 pm PT / 8 pm ET, the chairs will open the
IRV poll.

-- dan (for the chairs)

[1] https://www.w3.org/2017/06/27-vcwg-minutes.html
[2]
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17EGPs3YXBmzTjFogGwafloDyiK5GN0iXyWD41sDo9Jw/edit#gid=0
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2017 19:59:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 27 June 2017 19:59:05 UTC