RE: Comments on delivery context ontology

Hi,

Thank you for your comments. We will answer them during the Last Call Review period

Best Regards

De: public-uwa-request@w3.org [mailto:public-uwa-request@w3.org] En nombre de Gottfried Zimmermann
Enviado el: miércoles, 23 de septiembre de 2009 21:09
Para: public-uwa@w3.org
Asunto: Comments on delivery context ontology

Here are some comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-dcontology-20090616/:



(1) Section 2.2 Normative Language for Conformance Requirements

It is not clear what it means if a class, property or instance is "not
normative".  Suggest saying something like "not normative concepts may be
implemented. If not implemented, these URIs must not be otherwise used."


(2) Class MmsClient

The abbreviation “MMS” is not explained in the whole document.


(3) Property id

There is a long list of subproperties of common:id?  Why are these
subproperties necessary?  Why not use common:id for all occurrences?


Thank you for your consideration,
Gottfried

___________________________________________________

 Dr. Gottfried Zimmermann
 ICT Accessibility Architect
 Access Technologies Group, Germany<http://www.accesstechnologiesgroup.com/>
 Phone +49 7121 790806
___________________________________________________