W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-usable-authentication@w3.org > September 2008

[WSC-UI LC] approve with comments

From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:42:59 -0400
Message-Id: <397CD30D-B9CC-41BE-8745-C51F23213A96@ieee.org>
Cc: wai-liaison@w3.org, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Kenny Johar <kennyjohar@gmail.com>, hartmans-ietf@mit.edu
To: public-usable-authentication@w3.org


This document appears to have successfully
incorporated the feedback we gave you on the
Requirements Note.  Thank you very much.

Al
/chair, PFWG

PS:

You asked us to help you respond to a comment
you received from Sam Hartmans, with
accessibility reasoning.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-usable-authentication/ 
2008Aug/0003.html

Kenny Johar looked at this and wants clarification from Sam
before responding.

Janina Sajka made the following good point:

The sonicon for change in "security sensitivity" needs
to be timely.  But what defines timely is not the visual
display but the change in the severity or sensitivity of
potential system responses to potentially-erroneous user
input.  So what you should do is define (in abstract terms)
the event as the change in input exposure to risk or
hazard.  Then tie prompt announcement of this in visual
and auditory media directly to that state change, not
daisy-chain the timing of one off the other. Both the
  auditory and visual displays need to be
prompt in announcing elevated-risk states.  Not that they
need to be strictly aligned in start time.  Where possible
the start-time alignment should be achieved as well.

Let's continue that discussion on public-usable-authentication@w3.org
and not have PFWG _consensus_ in the loop to
slow resolution.
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 13:43:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:15 GMT