- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:29:20 -0800
- To: "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@networkresonance.com>, "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Cc: <beltzner@mozilla.com>, "public-usable-authentication" <public-usable-authentication@w3.org>
More IP address consumption is one consequence, another is that parties may not be able to deploy proposed security enhancements due to lack of available IP space. > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:ekr@networkresonance.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 12:29 PM > To: Mary Ellen Zurko > Cc: Hallam-Baker, Phillip; beltzner@mozilla.com; > public-usable-authentication > Subject: Re: Produce material on name-based virtual hosting and TLS > > Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> wrote: > > OK. But what effect does the "protocol limitations" have on > usable and > > robust security context information (which was also part of > what I was > > trying to get clarity on). Did I get the effect right (increase in > > errors on cert processing, so setting user expectations that errors > > are not a problem)? > > More IP address consumption? :) > > -Ekr >
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 18:31:08 UTC