Re: Updated charters, with tentative time line

> > I'm a bit worried about: 
> > "a minimal set of security context information "
> 
> > It seems to imply a single small set of items will be
> > required of any user agent. I don't think it will work out
> > that way, though I do think the alternatives will collapse
> > to a small conceptual set, and that their presence or lack
> > will be important to users. Things like user/web agent 
> > history, and strength and meaningfulness of
> > identification/authentication. 
> 
> Would you have a suggestion for wording that might address your
> concern?

Not yet. And it could be read that way ("here's the set that should be 
accessible to users, and of course if items don't exist, then that 
information should be accessible to users"). I wanted to see if there was 
a notion that it should be read more stringently. 

        Mez