W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-usable-authentication@w3.org > April 2006

AW: Authentication Idea

From: Sebastian Gajek <sebastian.gajek@nds.rub.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:48:38 +0200
To: <public-usable-authentication@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E1FTIIU-0004S6-3m@maggie.w3.org>

Sound like the idea of McCune, Perrig and Reiter: "Seeing is believing:
Using Camera Phones for Human-Verifiable Authentication". See

Is it right???


	Von: public-usable-authentication-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-usable-authentication-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von John
	Gesendet: Montag, 10. April 2006 21:42
	An: public-usable-authentication@w3.org
	Betreff: Authentication Idea
	Hello all, I didn't attend the conference, but I would like to put
forward an idea for authentication.
	I will try to be as brief as possible, if any of you would like to
know more about this idea, I would be happy to give more details.
	The key concept is to use the users mobile phone as a second factor
in authentication.
	The mobile phone requires a camera and software to interpret a
	(possibly a 2 dimensional, multi-shade barcode)
	Example process
	- Whilst on a trusted machine, user requests an authentication key
	- Server sends the user a package, containing
	   The url of the service
	   The name of the service
	   The decryption key 
	   (all wrapped up in a barcode image)
	- User photographs the screen, and the mobile unwraps the package,
and generates an entry for this site.
	- The user requests to authenticate using Image Authentiation
	- The server sends the user a package, containing
	   The URL of the service
	   An encrypted message containing
	   The name of the service
	   A short message
	- The user photographs the screen, and the mobile decrypts the
	 (checking that the name of the service matches the URL)
	- The user enters the short message (and possibly a part of their
	- If the message is correct, the user is considered to be
	Authenticates both parties
	Limits the damage a Keylogger would do (hence can be used from an
untrusted computer)
	Has no cost if the user has a camera phone.
	(so sites can deploy it with no capital outlay)
	Requires a seperate device (but only one device for all services)
	Thank you very much for reading this far.
	John Best
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2006 14:16:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:15 UTC