W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-usability-workshop@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Draft Charter

From: Sharon Laskowski <sharon.laskowski@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:47:35 -0500
Message-ID: <1043686055.3e3562a7a46e3@imp.nist.gov>
To: public-usability-workshop@w3.org

Quoting Nick Gassman <nick@netwiz.demon.co.uk>:

> 
> Is this draft on the website yet?

I'll put it on the http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/uig_w3c/ site today, dated.

It is in the listserv archives as well: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-usability-workshop/

> 
> 4) Other groups

good points about acronyms and non-US HCI groups; I agree.
  > 
> 6) Success
> 
> I'd like to see the success criteria in a 3-column format with headings
> of  ....

Look at the WAI charter: success criteria is similar to ours:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG/charter2.html 

At this point I think it is premature to put in tables and spend a lot of time.
I do like NIck's re-wording of "useful comments" to'positive response from the 
chairs of other W3C groups on the input from this UG'

 > 7.2) Communication
> 
> As an example of usability best practice, the words 'domain leader'
> should be linked to a small popup, or a page elsewhere that defines the
> term. All publications should follow this principle if, as in this case,
> they are likely to be read by people who are unfamiliar with the jargon.


IN general YES, but the audience here is the W3C executive committee so this is 
not jargon to them.  


Sharon

> 
Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 11:48:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:17:28 GMT