- From: Sharon Laskowski <sharon.laskowski@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:33:39 -0500
- To: public-usability-workshop@w3.org
- Cc: Todd Warfel <lists@mk27.com>
Good question. As a practical matter, we are just starting the interest group and don't have a lot of resources, so it makes sense to me to initially just look at web sites. The question of web apps being in scope or not is, perhaps, something that should be discussed once the IG gets going. There are obviously some issues that would carryover, but once you enlarge the scope to apps you have to look at software usability issues in general. The WAI guidelines, for example, skirt around this issue. Many guidelines are specific to markup languages, but where needed they mention things like making embedded applications accessible or recommending good software design practice. I don't think the scope in the charter itself needs to be more specific at this point. Sharon Quoting Steven Pemberton <steven@w3.org>: > > From: "Todd Warfel" <lists@mk27.com> > To: <public-usability-workshop@w3.org> > Cc: "Steven Pemberton" <steven@w3.org> > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:33 PM > Subject: [Moderator Action] Re: Draft Charter > > > Will we be making a distinction between Web sites and Web-based > applications? Are we lumping the two together, or are Web-based > applications > outside the scope of this group/consortium? > > > On 1/22/03 9:29 AM, "Steven Pemberton" <steven@w3.org> wrote: > > > > > Comments? > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Steven Pemberton > > > > > > Just as a reminder, the workshop is documented at > > > > > > http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/uig_w3c/ > > > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > Todd R. Warfel > > > > _//message first [method second] > > .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--. > > _//user experience architect > > Information architecture > > Interaction design > > Usability analysis > > [P] (607) 339-9640 > > [E] twarfel@messagefirst.com > > [w] http://www.messagefirst.com > > .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--. > > > > In theory, theory and practice are the same, > > but in practice, they're not -- anonymous > > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 11:33:58 UTC