- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:01:05 +0900
- To: public-unicorn@w3.org
- Cc: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
[Thanks for the feedback Patrick. I'm forwarding it to the unicorn- specific mailing-list] Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: public-qa-dev@w3.org > From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk> > Date: October 10, 2006 05:23:52 JST > To: public-qa-dev@w3.org > Cc: WaSP ATF <AccessibilityTF@webstandards.org> > Subject: unicorn feedback > > purely on the first screen of http://qa-dev.w3.org/unicorn/ > > - those form elements could do with some actual label elements to > go with them > - could the application assume http:// when an address was simply > entered without a particular protocol? > - why exactly is javascript a requirement to validate documents? is > it not just a requirement for the proper operation of this initial > page, and even there could it not be implemented in a graceful way > so that, without javascript, everything is still perfectly > functioning? > > > After submission with an error (e.g. omitting "http://" for > instance), you have "Below is a stack trace from Unicorn to help > solving the problem". Who does this help, exactly? The users or the > developers? As I suspect it's the latter, is it truly necessary to > show the stack trace, rather than a friendly "you forgot to put a > protocol in...", ideally with a copy of the previously submitted > form, already populated with what the user originally entered? > > And, probably a feature that's already in the works: needs to have > an option to actually show the source code, or at least show the > particular line that throws errors. > > Apart from that, it's looking very handy. > > Patrick > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > __________________________________________________________ > re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively > [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] > www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk > http://redux.deviantart.com > __________________________________________________________ > Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force > http://webstandards.org/ > __________________________________________________________ >
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 06:01:16 UTC