- From: François Daoust via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:29:54 +0000
- To: public-tvcontrol@w3.org
@chrisn asked: > Should we introduce more specific application type interfaces here. e.g. for the DAB/DVB User applications (Slideshow, DL, Journaline, HbbTV, MHEG)? Or are we happy with just delivering the applicationData to the developers. That seems like a place in the spec where we would like others (or other specs) to be able to define extensions. A similar example that comes to mind is the work on the [Generic Sensor API](https://w3c.github.io/sensors/). From an IDL perspective, it defines a base `Sensor` interface and let other specs define concrete sensors interface that inherit from `Sensor`. It seems a good idea to follow the same path here. > I think my own preference would be to have application-specific interfaces I agree. We probably do not want a fixed enumeration for application types in any case. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tidoust Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/tvcontrol-api/pull/14#issuecomment-256567754 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 07:30:01 UTC