RE: Action-4: Consolidated Technical Requirement

Thank you Chris. That's great and talk to you tomorrow.

Bin

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Needham [mailto:chris.needham@bbc.co.uk] 
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 9:19 AM
To: HU, BIN
Cc: public-tvapi@w3.org
Subject: RE: Action-4: Consolidated Technical Requirement

Hi Bin, 

Thanks for your work on the requirements. I have added a few more items to the Use Cases and Requirements pages: playback of recorded programmes, timeshifted playback, and webapp access to broadcast subtitle data.

Best regards,

Chris

________________________________________
From: HU, BIN [bh526r@att.com]
Sent: 07 July 2014 15:20
To: Gene Lian
Cc: public-tvapi@w3.org
Subject: RE: Action-4: Consolidated Technical Requirement

Gene,

It looks great and talk to you tomorrow.
Bin

-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Lian [mailto:clian@mozilla.com]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 3:05 AM
To: HU, BIN
Cc: public-tvapi@w3.org
Subject: Re: Action-4: Consolidated Technical Requirement

Hi Bin,

Thank you very much for consolidating the user cases, which must take
you lots of time and efforts. This work is awesome!

Btw, I also follow your changes and semantic to add a new item for the
Conditional Access System (CAS) Requirements [1].

Meet you guys soon! :)

[1] https://www.w3.org/community/tvapi/wiki/Main_Page/Technical_Requirement#Conditional_Access_System_.28CAS.29_Requirements

Regard,
Gene

----- Original Message -----
> From: "BIN HU" <bh526r@att.com>
> To: public-tvapi@w3.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 10:19:13 PM
> Subject: Action-4: Consolidated Technical Requirement
>
> Hello team,
>
> I have an open action item to consolidate input contributions of technical
> use cases to technical requirements. Here you are [1].
>
> Basically, what I did are:
>
> (1)    Categorized them into 11 functional groups according to original input
>
> (2)    Re-worded the requirements with more normalized language, e.g. "SHALL
> be" instead of "is", wherever appropriate
>
> (3)    Re-worded the requirements to focus on API's v.s. the webapps
> development instead of app function / user interaction
>
> (4)    A few duplicates from different inputs were consolidated
>
> (5)    A few webapps requirement (e.g. app functions or UI functions) were
> not captured because those are not directly related to APIs
>
> Regarding (4) above, here are highlighted specifics:
>
> -          "The API is able to let the user scan (or stop scanning) the
> channels that are available on the air" (Mozilla, Channel) is duplicate and
> consolidated into "Tuner Channel Scan Requirements" category
>
> -          The ETRI / Program requirements were consolidated into "General
> Program Requirements"
>
> -          The ETRI / Source requirements were consolidated into "General
> Channel Requirements"
>
> -          Re "The API is able to let the user retrieve data from the
> broadcaster's remote servers to provide more program-/content-related
> information. To do this, we need to define a universal way to identify the
> program on the web" (Mozilla, Others), essential functional requirements
> were consolidated into "General Program Requirements", while app functions
> were not captured.
>
> Regarding to (5) above, here are highlighted specifics:
>
> -          "The API is able to let the user watch multiple programs
> concurrently on the screen (e.g., Picture-in-Picture)" (Mozilla, Others)
> seems an application function (UI related), thus it was not captured.
>
> -          "The API is able to let the user navigate through the EPG and
> directly select a program to watch" (Mozilla, EPG) seems an application
> function (UI related), thus it was not captured.
>
> -          "The API is able to let the user browse through the list of other
> programs while (s)he is watching a program" (Mozilla, EPG) seems an
> application function (UI related), thus it was not captured.
>
> -          The ETRI / Channel requirements seems an application function (UI
> related), thus it was not captured.
>
> -          Note: If certain API functions are indeed needed for any of above,
> e.g. events and/or triggers, we can add it.
>
> Let me know if there is any question, and we can discuss it in the mailing
> list and the conference call next Tuesday.
> Thank you
>
> Bin
> [1] https://www.w3.org/community/tvapi/wiki/Main_Page/Technical_Requirement
>

Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 16:33:05 UTC