Re: Closure of Call for Consensus to request transition of TTML2 Edition to Proposed Recommendation

The IR is in flux. I am actively working on the IR this evening, so stand
by with comments.

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Cyril Concolato <cconcolato@netflix.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Could we add a legend to the implementation report?
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/TTML2ImplementationReport
>
> IIUC:
> In the column titles,
> #V means number of validation processors
> #X means number of transformation processors
> #P means number of presentation processors
> #T means total
>
> while in the rows:
> F means Full Validation (including failing on invalid tests)
> S means Strict Validation (not failing validation on invalid tests)
> X means Full Presentation
> P means Partial Presentation
>
> Also we should fix some totals which seem wrong: we cannot have #T=10 when
> we declare at most 8 implementations.
>
> Cyril
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 8:03 AM Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Following my CfC issued at https://lists.w3.org/
>> Archives/Public/public-tt/2018Sep/0072.html I have received no
>> objections and therefore I declare we have consensus to request transition
>> of TTML2 to Proposed Recommendation when the stated preconditions have been
>> met:
>>
>> 1. The Implementation Report is complete and demonstrates that we have
>> met the CR Exit Criteria.
>> 2. The pubrules checker and link checker are (or can be, on publication)
>> satisfied.
>>
>> There are no issues open on the ttml2 repo relating to Proposed
>> Recommendation. There is one pull request open for the creation of the PR
>> publishing package.
>>
>> *RESOLUTION: When the preconditions listed above have been met, request
>> transition of TTML2 to Proposed Recommendation*
>>
>> I understand the only remaining precondition that has not yet been met is
>> finalisation of the Implementation Report, which we can confirm during
>> tomorrow's call.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------
>>
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk
>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
>> personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically
>> stated.
>> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
>> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
>> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
>> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>>
>> ---------------------
>>
>