W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > July 2018

Call for Consensus to request transition of TTML2 to CR3

From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 17:58:24 +0000
To: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D77BC175.621D8%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
All,

As agreed during last week's call<https://www.w3.org/2018/07/19-tt-minutes.html#item02>, the open pull requests on TTML2 have been merged (early) into the editor's draft so the complete document can be reviewed. This means that part of the normal review period for pull requests is being run simultaneously with this call for consensus to request transition.

This email is a call for consensus to request transition of TTML2 to CR3 based on the ED.

Please review the CR3 draft at https://w3c.github.io/ttml2/index.html with a view to agreeing with the proposal to request transition to CR3.

This email is the call for consensus that begins the countdown timer on our decision policy: if no objection to requesting transition is received by end of Tuesday 7th August then the Resolution is passed and I will request the transition to CR3.

For ease of reference the following 10 substantive pull requests have been merged for this CR3 draft (available on GitHub at https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed+label%3Asubstantive+milestone%3ACR3); all were merged early:

Merged #930 Map out-of-line animation to inline animation to handle styling seman…<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/930>
Merged #928 Clarify that descendants of conditionally excluded elements are alway…<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/928>
Merged #925 Improve structure, handle image in [flow transformation], and link pr…<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/925>
Merged #924 Address possible conflict in placement of ruby text containers (#882).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/924>
Merged #921 Allow continuous animation of border color (#917).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/921>
Merged #920 Add @extent to isd:{sequence,isd} (#919).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/920>
Merged #867 Clarify constancy of ECP and EPP (#860).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/867>
Merged #914 Scale back style animatability (#881).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/914>
Merged #913 Update TTML1 reference (#884).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/913>
Merged #898 Ensure audio and image (in presentation contexts) are treated as cont…<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/898>


And the following editorial pull requests were merged early recently:

Merged #909 Clarify computed cell size; improve language pertaining to pixels (#8…<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/909>
Merged #890 Clarify use of terms altitude, depth, and line gap; add non-normative…<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/890>
Merged #923 Miscellaneous editorial improvements (#895).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/923>
Merged #922 Sort order of elements in list in 10.4.4.4 (#916).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/922>
Merged #911 Editorial improvements to 11.3.1.2 Inline Regions (#903).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/911>
Merged #900 Improve definition of conditionally excluded (included) (#893).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/900>
Merged #899 Editorial improvements for 'content element' usage (#892).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/899>
Merged #886 Note potential for false negatives with [validate document] (#876).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/886>
Merged #912 Note that ISD construction may include early style resolution (#904).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/912>
Merged #908 Fix typos and styling (#894).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/908>
Merged #897 Add clip{Begin,End} attributes to tt:audio in schemas (#887).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/897>
Merged #902 Update acknowledgments (#901).<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/902>
Merged #915 Switch to CR entities, update dates in status.<https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/915>

The normal review period for pull requests, as per our decision policy, is 10 working days from when they are opened. Effectively this CfC extends that period, which is reasonable given there are multiple simultaneous changes to review all at once.

Scope of review

The changes listed above are the scope of the review – any comments on the specification relating to the CfC need to relate to them; by extension any further changes made during the CfC must address those comments. If there are comments on other parts of the specification they will be deferred until after the CfC and CR3.

Objections

Nonetheless, there may still be formal objections to proceeding with the CR3 transition request for any legitimate reason – if you are planning to object, please ensure that you give a clear rationale for objecting that allows the WG to consider an action and potentially proceed on an alternate path.

Kind regards,

Nigel







----------------------------

http://www.bbc.co.uk

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

---------------------
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2018 17:58:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 24 July 2018 17:58:50 UTC