W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > July 2018

FW: CSS Text Decoration Module Level 3 Candidate Recommendation Revised (Call for Implementations)

From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:09:20 +0000
To: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D760FB92.60352%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
This may be of interest for implementers of TTML2 or IMSC 1.1 particularly:

On 03/07/2018, 09:37, "Xueyuan" <xueyuan@w3.org> wrote:

>
>Dear Advisory Committee Representative,
>Chairs,
>
>I am pleased to announce that CSS Text Decoration Module Level 3 has
>been republished as a W3C Candidate Recommendation:
>   https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-text-decor-3-20180703/
>
>The approval and publication are in response to this transition request:
>   https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/53
>
>Please provide feedback by 31 December 2018 as follows:
>   raise an issue on GitHub
>   https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues
>
>Patent disclosures relevant to this specification may be found on the
>CSS Working Group's patent disclosure page in conformance with W3C policy:
>   https://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/32061/status
>
>This Call for Implementations follows section 6.4 "Candidate
>Recommendation" of the W3C Process Document:
>   https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#candidate-rec
>
>Thank you,
>
>For Tim Berners-Lee, Director, and
>Philippe Le Hégaret, Project Management Lead;
>Xueyuan Jia, W3C Marketing & Communications
>
>==============================================
>Quoting from
>CSS Text Decoration Module Level 3
>W3C Candidate Recommendation, 03 July 2018
>
>This version:
>   https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-text-decor-3-20180703/
>Latest published version:
>   https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-decor-3/
>
>Abstract:
>
>This module contains the features of CSS relating to text decoration,
>such as underlines, text shadows, and emphasis marks.
>
>CSS is a language for describing the rendering of structured documents
>(such as HTML and XML) on screen, on paper, in speech, etc.
>
>Status of this document:
>
>This section describes the status of this document at the time of its
>publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of
>current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical
>report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at
>https://www.w3.org/TR/.
>
>This document was produced by the CSS Working Group as a Candidate
>Recommendation. This document is intended to become a W3C
>Recommendation. This document will remain a Candidate Recommendation at
>least until 31 December 2018 in order to ensure the opportunity for wide
>review.
>
>GitHub Issues are preferred for discussion of this specification. When
>filing an issue, please put the text ³css-text-decor² in the title,
>preferably like this: ³[css-text-decor] Šsummary of commentŠ². All
>issues and comments are archived, and there is also a historical archive.
>
>Publication as a Candidate Recommendation does not imply endorsement by
>the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated,
>replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is
>inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.
>
>This document was produced by a group operating under the W3C Patent
>Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in
>connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes
>instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual
>knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential
>Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of
>the W3C Patent Policy.
>
>This document is governed by the 1 February 2018 W3C Process Document.
>
>For changes since the last draft, see the Changes section.
>
>A draft implementation report is available.
>
>The following features are at-risk, and may be dropped during the CR
>period:
>
>The ability to place both emphasis marks and ruby on the same base text.
>³At-risk² is a W3C Process term-of-art, and does not necessarily imply
>that the feature is in danger of being dropped or delayed. It means that
>the WG believes the feature may have difficulty being interoperably
>implemented in a timely manner, and marking it as such allows the WG to
>drop the feature if necessary when transitioning to the Proposed Rec
>stage, without having to publish a new Candidate Rec without the feature
>first.
>==============================================
>
>
>



-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2018 09:09:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 3 July 2018 09:09:50 UTC