Status of my TTML2 issues/PR

Hi all,

In preparation for the coming meeting, here is the status of my issues/PR.
I've added the agenda label for the points I'd like to discuss.

Additionally, there are several issues not assigned and without resolution.
We need to check them.

7 open issues (6 i18n) are assigned to me:

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/358
It's the TTML1 umbrella issue. We could almost close it but for:
https://github.com/w3c/ttml1/#317 "chained referential styling
(continued)". Not closed in TTML1.
https://github.com/w3c/ttml1/#320 "Add better overflow example". Just saw
that it' has been closed. Will prepare a PR.
I suggest that we close or defer ttml1/#317 and then close ttml2/#358

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/246
i18n
I agree with the comment. I will provide a PR changing the example text
only. I need confirmation that the example image does not need to be
regenerated because I cannot regenerate it.

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/247
i18n
Also related to the previous issue. It is unclear to me how the mapping
between annotation and base text is done in case of complex annotations
using textContainer ... To be discussed.

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/252
i18n
As indicated, I'm OK to defer this to TTML.next (would resolve issue #373
too). Need to have a resolution to prepare the PR.

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/277
https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/280
https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/281
i18n
These 3 issues are very similar and ask for alignment with CSS. They need
group discussion.

18 PR open assigned to me. Most of them are approved. The others are:

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/570
Glenn disagrees with the resolution. To discuss.

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/575
Need to clarify the agreement. To discuss.

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/600
Glenn wants to use another PR. To discuss.

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/605
Nigel wants some changes. Will do. No discussion needed.

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/613
Nigel wants a change. Will do. No discussion needed.

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/617
Added back error behavior. Nigel and Glenn to review again. Should be ok. No
discussion needed.

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/618
Just needs review. Should be ok. No discussion needed.

https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pull/619
PR needs more work. Dependent on i18n comments resolution. To discuss.

HTH,
Cyril