- From: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:51:55 -0800
- To: Andreas Tai <tai@irt.de>
- Cc: David Ronca <dronca@netflix.com>, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
> On Nov 28, 2017, at 10:44 , Andreas Tai <tai@irt.de> wrote: > > Dear all, > > It seems obvious to me that we currently do not have any consensus on the discussed issue. I certainly do not agree to take established attributes, copy them to TTML and give them another namespace (e.g. the TTML Styling namespace). I have strong concerns about this procedure (which is one of the core aspects of the Netflix proposals). I commented this in the f2f meeting, in discussions and also in a wide review comment to TTML2. I think there is at least a courtesy problem, if not a formal one, if the “other namespace” and its defining document are not W3C ones, which appears to be the case here (I assume ebutts: is EBU Timed Text). Have we not already had this issue with SMPTE extensions? David Singer singer@mac.com
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:52:23 UTC