W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > June 2017

Re: IMSC1.0.1 schemas as a WG Note now

From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 09:26:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF_7JxBuR-AosfaH18kWKvkXLayDx_5gtqD3v3ZT0TBdH-HH+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Cc: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>, Michael Dolan <mike@dolan.tv>, "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
Hi Nigel,

It sounds like we are inventing a new process when the WG Note process
already exists.

Best,

-- Pierre

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>> On 24 Jun 2017, at 17:20, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nigel,
>>
>>> Why the complexity here?
>>
>> I am concerned that modifying the github repo can be done by any
>> number of folks, including by mistake.
>
> It can; I would suggest tagging a release when we have a known good state (as far as we are aware at that time) and declaring the current operational release tag in a protected master branch readme file.
>
> Then any change would only be reflected in a new release by explicit decision, which could be by Group consensus.
>
> Nigel
>
>>
>> Revising a WG Note requires group consensus.
>>
>> I am open to other options.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -- Pierre
>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Why the complexity here? Can't we just publish the GitHub repo details and host them directly from there? That makes them much easier to use and update.
>>>
>>> Nigel
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 24 Jun 2017, at 06:45, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mike,
>>>> We don't necessarly need to have a WG Note for this.
>>>> We can publish the current schemas files on the W3C site (out of TR) and that will be good enough. No over burdon.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to host those schemas at
>>>>
>>>> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/IMSC/ttml-imsc1.0.1/xml-schemas/
>>>>
>>>> and change the link in the spec to this URI.
>>>>
>>>> Thierry
>>>>
>>>>> Le 24/06/2017 à 01:04, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux a écrit :
>>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>>
>>>>>> put the schemas in a WG Note now and reference it before publishing IMSC1.0.1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok with me. I would create a separate directory on the IMSC github
>>>>> repo to host the WG Note and XSD collection.
>>>>>
>>>>> Happy to do this by Monday COB, in time for approval on Thursday and
>>>>> the IMSC1.0.1 CR transition, unless significant concerns are raised.
>>>>>
>>>>> This switch might not even be substantive since the XSD are
>>>>> informative in IMSC1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Pierre
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Michael Dolan <mike@dolan.tv> wrote:
>>>>>> Given the apparent process challenges for updating the informative schemas
>>>>>> for IMSC1, I’d like to propose that we do that before publication of
>>>>>> IMSC1.0.1 – put the schemas in a WG Note now and reference it before
>>>>>> publishing IMSC1.0.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>               Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael A DOLAN
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TBT, Inc;  PO Box 190
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Del Mar, CA 92014
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1-858-882-7497
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----------------------------
>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk
>>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
>>> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
>>> If you have received it in
>>> error, please delete it from your system.
>>> Do not use, copy or disclose the
>>> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
>>> immediately.
>>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
>>> sent or received.
>>> Further communication will signify your consent to
>>> this.
>>> -----------------------------
Received on Saturday, 24 June 2017 16:27:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:41 UTC