W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > December 2017

Re: VTT, moving along, push WD and review Wide Review

From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:29:54 +0000
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D64F005B.501A6%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
I don't think I missed a memo, and apologies if I did, but I did not
realise that the CG has completed draft dispositions for the WG to approve
- indeed it seems like some of them are still being worked on. If so it's
premature to ask for confirmation of end of review when the beginning of
the review hasn't been flagged.


On 06/12/2017, 20:40, "singer@apple.com on behalf of David Singer"
<singer@apple.com> wrote:

>Friends
>
>following this message in June I received private feedback that one issue
>was not satisfactorily closed (support of colors in non-CSS UAs) but
>otherwise no other feedback. I think I should therefore take silence as
>assent and mark the issues in the wide review page as having WG reflect
>the CG status, with a note that the color issue is now resolved as part
>of the second wide review.
>
>
>Thank you for your consideration
>
>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:18 , David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Friends
>> 
>> the CG has worked in email and GitHub to close out all the issues that
>>were revealed in the previous wide review, and believes that those, and
>>other critical issues, have been handled. I have asked the CG for
>>confirmation of this.
>> 
>> On the page <https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebVTT_Wide_Review>  you will find
>>documentation of the wide review received. It was built in the days when
>>we were using BugZilla, so alas, for bugs that were transferred to
>>GitHub and resolved there, youšll need to follow forwarding pointers, to
>>see the complete history (if you care).
>> 
>> Thierry would like a formal status from the WG on each bug; youšll see
>>the table of possible statuses at the end of the page (has this been
>>done for other specs?). I have not yet filled in the WG column, but
>>obviously could take the implied status from the CG column. Please let
>>the group know if you think that is wrong.
>> 
>> The specification is in much better shape; the test suite has been
>>greatly improved (we hired a contractor) and does good coverage. We are
>>working on a test report. With that in hand, we are hoping for a quick
>>wide-review prior to a CR transition. Yes, we expect that some features
>>will be marked Œat riskš in that transition; wešll be looking at the
>>test report.
>> 
>> The latest editoršs draft is at <https://w3c.github.io/webvtt/>. I
>>think we are badly behind on the working draft heartbeat requirement; I
>>would like to push this as a WD. We previously asked for assent to have
>>the editor push WDs automatically, but the WG indicated it preferred a
>>resolution. Please consider resolving this in email or on a call (as you
>>prefer). I cannot join the call this week.
>> 
>> Once we have:
>> * your acceptance of the handling of the wide review issues
>> * the WD in place
>> * the test suite report in hand
>> 
>> I expect to ask for a transition to CR.
>> 
>> Thank you for your patience and attention; it has been a long road.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> David Singer
>> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>> 
>
>David Singer
>Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
>
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2017 14:30:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 7 December 2017 14:30:25 UTC