On Friday, November 11, 2016 4:25:05 PM CET David Singer wrote: > Hi CSS > > I think I sent this from the wrong email address before and so it might > not have been received... > On Apr 12, 2015, at 4:31 , Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 7) Section 6.2.3.3: It looks like cue regions are basically blocks > >> that get filled with cues. Why not just make those an element > >> selectable by ::cue()? You're limited to the same styles that apply > >> to ::cue anyway. > > Registered at https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28473 > > We’re not entirely sure we understand this comment. Are you suggesting > we view regions as if they were divs, that contain cues, that are > effectively divs? The syntax of WebVTT doesn’t really have the > concept of nesting here; it’s line-based, not tag-based. Can you > clarify your suggestion? Hmm, it's a long time ago and it wasn't me who wrote the comment. I think the suggestions was to add '::cue(region)' and drop '::cue-region'. In other words: let '::cue' apply to regions (in addition to the other cues it already applies to) and then allow '::cue(region)' analogous to '::cue(v)' and '::cue(i)' for more specific selectors. Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 14 November 2016 13:40:52 UTC