W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [webvtt] comments from the CSS WG on WD-webvtt1-20141111

From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:40:28 +0100
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Public TTWG List <public-tt@w3.org>, Silvia Pfieffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3127166.t3OMgxN80t@nyx>
On Friday, November 11, 2016 4:25:05 PM CET David Singer wrote:
> Hi CSS
> 
> I think I sent this from the wrong email address before and so it might
> not have been received...

> On Apr 12, 2015, at 4:31 , Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> 7) Section 6.2.3.3: It looks like cue regions are basically blocks
> >> that get filled with cues. Why not just make those an element
> >> selectable by ::cue()? You're limited to the same styles that apply
> >> to ::cue anyway.
> > Registered at https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28473
> 
> We’re not entirely sure we understand this comment. Are you suggesting
> we view regions as if they were divs, that contain cues, that are
> effectively divs?  The syntax of WebVTT doesn’t really have the
> concept of nesting here; it’s line-based, not tag-based.  Can you
> clarify your suggestion?

Hmm, it's a long time ago and it wasn't me who wrote the comment. I think 
the suggestions was to add '::cue(region)' and drop '::cue-region'. In 
other words: let '::cue' apply to regions (in addition to the other cues 
it already applies to) and then allow '::cue(region)' analogous to 
'::cue(v)' and '::cue(i)' for more specific selectors.



Bert
-- 
  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos                               W3C/ERCIM
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Monday, 14 November 2016 13:40:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:33 UTC