Re: TTML2 and questionnaire for Security and Privacy; for review.

I approuved today during our call, I will send it to Security and Privacy.

Thierry

Le 03/11/2016 à 10:00, Nigel Megitt a écrit :
> Looks good to me - thanks Thierry.
>
> Nigel
>
>
> On 03/11/2016, 07:22, "Thierry MICHEL" <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> I guess the following should be the final version for review regarding
>> TTML2, to answer the Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and Privacy
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Questions to Consider:
>> 3.1 Does this specification deal with personally-identifiable
>> information?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.2 Does this specification deal with high-value data?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.3 Does this specification introduce new state for an origin that
>> persists across browsing sessions?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.4 Does this specification expose persistent, cross-origin state to the
>> web?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.5 Does this specification expose any other data to an origin that it
>> doesnt currently have access to?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.6 Does this specification enable new script execution/loading
>> mechanisms?
>> -->  This question as worded is ambiguous to us; is it only about script
>> loading and script execution ?
>> In our case, a TTML2 document in which a change in the value of an
>> externally passed in parameter or a media query (for example) may cause
>> a modification of behavior, and this may lead to the loading of external
>> resources including audio, images etc, though excluding scripts. We do
>> not consider "condition" mechanism to be a scripting language.
>> TTML2 allows loading of resources, just not scripts, and has fetch
>> semantics by the introduction of external resource loading. It also
>> allows the addition of links on spans that can have hyperlinks.
>>
>> 3.7 Does this specification allow an origin access to a user¹s location?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.8 Does this specification allow an origin access to sensors on a
>> users device?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.9 Does this specification allow an origin access to aspects of a
>> user¹s local computing environment?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.10 Does this specification allow an origin access to other devices?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.11 Does this specification allow an origin some measure of control
>> over a user agent¹s native UI?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.12 Does this specification expose temporary identifiers to the web?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.13 Does this specification distinguish between behavior in first-party
>> and third-party contexts?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> 3.14 How should this specification work in the context of a user agent's
>> "incognito" mode?
>> --> This specification has no impact on any incognito mode since the
>> answer to all the questions about exposing details to origins are "No".
>>
>> 3.15 Does this specification persist data to a user¹s local device?
>> --> User agents may choose to cache referenced external resources; this
>> implementation detail is not covered by this specification and the
>> specification makes no explicit requirement for caching or non-caching
>> of any external resource.
>>
>> 3.16 Does this specification have a "Security Considerations" and
>> "Privacy Considerations" section?
>> --> YES it does. See the media type registration which is an integral
>> part of it.
>>
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/ttml+xml
>>
>> 3.17 Does this specification allow downgrading default security
>> characteristics?
>> --> NO it doesn't.
>>
>> _______________________________
>
>
>
> -----------------------------
> http://www.bbc.co.uk
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
> If you have received it in
> error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the
> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
> immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
> sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to
> this.
> -----------------------------
>

Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 09:03:22 UTC