W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > October 2014

FW: [restyle] Questionnaire wrt Redesign of the W3C Spec Templates

From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:18:01 +0000
To: "'Timed Text Working Group'" <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D06156F4.1434C%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
All,

If you're involved in writing W3C specs and/or have a view on our specs'
visual design, please respond as below. We don't need a group consensus
here: you can contribute directly; conversely if there's something you
think needs a group view please start a reflector discussion on the topic.

Kind regards,

Nigel


On 11/10/2014 06:07, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>We're looking into redesigning the W3C spec templates and style sheets
>to reduce boilerplate content and improve usability and readability.
>To help guide this project, we wanted to collect some information from
>all the W3C WGs!
>
>So please forward this to your WGs; answers are welcome from WGs as a
>whole and/or individual members, or some combination thereof, however
>your group prefers to answer. Send them to spec-prod@w3.org [public].
>
>   1. Give me 3-5 adjectives for how the visual design of
>      a W3C spec should "feel".
>
>   2. List the URLs to 3 specs that are representative of
>      your WG's output (especially wrt markup and structure
>      of the content).
>
>   3. Do you have any documentation of your markup conventions?
>      Please paste URLs:
>
>   4. What spec processing tools does your WG actively use?
>
>   5. What are your goals for the redesign?
>
>   6. Is there anything else we should know / consider?
>
>
>Note: This project is going to be a consensus-driven experiment, so
>feedback will be welcome throughout. However, it is also a spare-time
>project, so progress might be a bit slow and sporadic. :)
>
>More information at https://www.w3.org/wiki/SpecProd/Restyle

>
>Thanks~
>~fantasai
>

Received on Monday, 13 October 2014 09:18:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:18 UTC