W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > August 2014

Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD

From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:35:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF_7JxA3Fq-PAQ0Jjp-bB-zrMqguONpvwAiFXRYoVF8Qvjt--Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Cc: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Hi Nigel,

The point is that the recommendations might fluctuate with time, and
it is not reasonable IMSC 1 and TTML 2 to track a moving target given
their timeline.

Best,

-- Pierre

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> The requirements we assess the Recommendations against do not need to be
> normative so I think it is reasonable for us to take a snapshot if they
> are not stable.
>
>
>
> On 19/08/2014 17:30, "Pierre-Anthony Lemieux" <pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
>
>>Aren't these specification working drafts, and thus subject to change?
>>If so, it is probably not reasonable to make TTML 2 and IMSC 1
>>contingent on them given their timeline.
>>
>>Best,
>>
>>-- Pierre
>>
>>On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>> Thanks for the heads-up Glenn. It looks like these bits:
>>>
>>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/#captionin
>>>g
>>> and
>>>
>>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/#enhanced-
>>>captions-subtitles
>>> are particularly relevant to us.
>>>
>>> Would anyone object to adopting those requirements as a subset of the
>>> requirements that TTML 2 and IMSC 1 should be measured against when
>>> assessing their conformance when it comes to LC/CR as per the process
>>>for
>>> publishing Recommendations (either the old or the new process)?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Nigel
>>>
>>> From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
>>> Date: Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:59
>>> To: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
>>> Subject: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD
>>> Resent-From: <public-tt@w3.org>
>>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:00
>>>
>>> Media Accessibility User Requirements Working Draft Updated
>>>
>>>    14 August 2014 | Archive
>>>
>>>    http://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/4024
>>>
>>>    The Protocols and Formats Working Group (PFWG) today published
>>>    an updated Working Draft of "Media Accessibility User
>>>    Requirements," a planned W3C Working Group Note. This document
>>>    describes the accessibility requirements of people with
>>>    disabilities with respect to audio and video on the Web,
>>>    particularly in the context of HTML5. It explains alternative
>>>    content technologies that people use to get audio and video
>>>    content, and how these fit in the larger picture of
>>>    accessibility, both technically within a web user agent and
>>>    from a production process point of view. Learn more about the
>>>    Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI).
>>>
>>>    http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/
>>>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/
>>>    http://www.w3.org/WAI/
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:36:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:17 UTC