W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > August 2014

Re: ACTION-318: Draft note wording for imsc conformance

From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 10:34:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF_7JxDqP8miC30od3orzQMOSn2_MPRZHnvUN0J-PaPNgqSWrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Addressed at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/diff/dffe001fa4c8/ttml-ww-profiles/ttml-ww-profiles.source.html

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> I mean all of 3.2.1.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> On 01/08/2014 15:46, "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>>
>> Seems a bit wordy, but OK.
>>
>>
>> Yeah I tried to go for accuracy and got verbosity as an added 'feature'.
>>
>> > It would probably be good to require an IMSC processor to satisfy the
>> > generic processor conformance rules of TTML.
>>
>> You mean bullets 1, 2 and 3 of Section 3.2.1 in TTML 1 SE? I think bullets
>> 4 and 5 are already covered.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As discussed yesterday, I propose the following wording for a
>>> non-normative note to be added to section 3. Conformance of IMSC:
>>>
>>> <--
>>> NOTE
>>> The terms Presentation Processor and Transformation Processor are defined
>>> by [TTML1] in general terms and more specifically with requirements for
>>> conformance with reference to the DFXP Presentation Profile and
>>> Transformation Profile. The use of those terms in this document does not
>>> imply that conformance to both the profiles defined herein and the relevant
>>> DFXP profile is required. It is not considered an error for a processor to
>>> be a conformant presentation processor or transformation processor in the
>>> context of this document without being a conformant TTML presentation
>>> processor or transformation processor.
>>> -->
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Nigel
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Saturday, 2 August 2014 08:35:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:17 UTC