W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > August 2014

Re: ACTION-318: Draft note wording for imsc conformance

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 08:46:34 -0600
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+cCOCv7WiBk8gwaKiiGZ_Covw7oG9yG0+c6K6Eo36hgXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Cc: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Seems a bit wordy, but OK. It would probably be good to require an IMSC
processor to satisfy the generic processor conformance rules of TTML.


On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote:

>  As discussed yesterday, I propose the following wording for a
> non-normative note to be added to section 3. Conformance of IMSC:
>
>  <--
> NOTE
> The terms Presentation Processor and Transformation Processor are defined
> by [TTML1] in general terms and more specifically with requirements for
> conformance with reference to the DFXP Presentation Profile and
> Transformation Profile. The use of those terms in this document does not
> imply that conformance to both the profiles defined herein *and* the
> relevant DFXP profile is required. It is not considered an error for a
> processor to be a conformant presentation processor or transformation
> processor in the context of this document without being a conformant TTML
> presentation processor or transformation processor.
> -->
>
>  Kind regards,
>
>  Nigel
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 1 August 2014 14:47:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:17 UTC