Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues from Silvia Pfeiffer on 2013-06-12 (public-tt@w3.org from June 2013)

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:05:53 +1000
To: John Birch <John.Birch@screensystems.tv>
Cc: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, public-tt <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=tFo_Y+TwuhragLwXsWB6tYSTCJDGg7Oft+gySVd9otA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:50 PM, John Birch
<John.Birch@screensystems.tv> wrote:
> I’m not personally over concerned with where or who does this kind of work,
> but am far more concerned with how it is done.
>
>
>
> For me, a process that involves substantial requirements analysis performed
> with the involvement of all potentially interested parties seems far more
> likely to result in a workable specification.

Agreed. That's what the email threads are after.


> If WebVTT is targeted at commercial use cases, it does IMHO seem to lack an
> evident appreciation of current captioning /subtitling workflows and
> conventions.

Please explain. What workflows and conventions does WebVTT break?

Best Regards,
Silvia.

Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 13:06:46 UTC