- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:04:42 +0800
- To: "Monica Martin (MS OPEN TECH)" <momartin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+fN1OdPOr+8bnv8WLG2=4PJTRAJDUmKZE6dGwWL5rDDfA@mail.gmail.com>
FIxed at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/rev/3d8fcd3f0193. Rewrote R0006 to use "an element MUST NOT" instead of "no element shall...". However, I see this is a problem also, which I will report in another issue. On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > I will change both of the shall to must to be consistent. TTML10 always > uses must. > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Monica Martin (MS OPEN TECH) < > momartin@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> Comments: There are only 2 instances where SHALL is used instead of MUST. >> One is a further description of an existing mandatory (MUST) requirement, >> R0006. R0006 could remain as is. >> >> Proposal: Revise R0047 to use MUST. >> >> Monica >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto: >> sysbot+tracker@w3.org] >> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:54 PM >> To: public-tt@w3.org >> Subject: ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery >> Profile for Closed Captions] >> >> ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery Profile for >> Closed Captions] >> >> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/186 >> >> Raised by: Glenn Adams >> On product: Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions >> >> SDP-US uses both SHALL and MUST in an arbitrary fashion; need to choose >> one and stick with it >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 02:07:40 UTC